Being sexual or non-sexual is a difficult concept to tackle. These photos of Danii-Ashley will seem sexual to some. This is where it gets interesting. Was the images created sexual or was it made that way by the viewer? What if I told you that the whole time Danii-Ashley was thinking about assembling a computer and at no point did she have a sexual thought in her head. In that case isn't her nudity and apparent lack of "shame", make these just photos of a nude body? Isn't the image interpreted by the viewer as being either sexual or not. What if as a viewer you have no sexual libido. Are the images sexual to you? Or just nude photos? Is sexual imagery directly related to our own desires, libido and experience?
